Fake Moon landing Hoax
Fake moon landing theory – The Apollo 12 lunar lander by NASA touched down on November 19th, 1969. It was only 4 months since Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin made history by setting the first human feet on the surface of the moon. It was a huge media event, broadcast live around the world and watched by 600 million people.
Comparatively few people in NASA followed the Apollo 12 mission. There was no live transmission, so the people have to rely on the official photograph taken by the astronauts. Among many pictures of the moon, observers noticed some odd about some particular pictures. Here are some observations.
Jets are powerful machines and being so they should leave an impact crater on the surface when they touch down. As our moon is supposed to be layered with dust, there should some telling of a landing. However, photos of the landings on the moon don’t show any visible crater underneath the landing module.
NASA said that they used the module to significantly lower thrust than what people think and when it landed on the solid rock surface on the moon. It would not make sense for it to be a substantial mark, as an impact crater.
To reach the moon first, one must pass through the Van Allen Radiation Belt. It is hundreds of times more dangerous to travel through it. NASA says that they have enough aluminum plate encoding in the interior and the exterior of the ship. As it is used to provide adequate protection to the astronauts. NASA also said that the time spent there was so short that it could not possibly accumulate the radiation enough to kill them.
As we know, it is one of the first photos of the moon landing that shows us a puzzling image to viewers. People noticed that the American flag rippled as if there was a breeze. This is problematic since there should be no wind on the moon. This is one of the initial arguments for a fake moon landing. NASA has gone to disapprove this claim by responding that they stored the flag in a tube. Which rippled from the force of being put down into the floor by the astronaut. While air does not exist on the moon, but the action and reaction work normally there.
It is one of the most famous photos that support the fake moon landing argument. The picture shows a rock on the ground of a perfectly symmetrical C graved inside. It’s likely the people assume that this is a label for a prop rock used in the Filming that they forget to put it down correctly.
It’s very difficult for something like this to happen in nature. It provides some pretty substantial evidence for the monkey business. They developed manually the film but did not digitally store it back then. It’s possible that there was just an error in the film’s development with someone’s hair pulling on it or intentionally writing on it.
One of the NASA photos shows the reflection as an object suspended in the sky that has never been explained. Most people compare it to the studio lights nothing on a lunar lander really resembles this object also so really don’t know what it is considered as a fake moon landing.
The US government did claim to have some of this exploring by landing on the moon since 1969. There is an intense deliberation as to the legitimacy of the event. In the solar system, there is only one light source available, which is the sun. By using basic lightning knowledge, all the shadows should fall in the same direction. Since all the light comes from one direction.
In the NASA pictures, it’s really clear that the shadows in different directions offering a strong case against the truth of the fake moon landing. They were actually multiple different lights showing that there was more to this event than what they have been telling us.
In NASA’S pictures, we even could not see any stars from the moon. There is a distinct lack of light sources from stars and pretty much all the photos from the trip. As there is no atmosphere and stars in the NASA moon landing pictures. It should be very easy to spot the bright lights from other stars.
But the NASA pictures remain vacant, as they theorize NASA left the stars out because it would be impossible to map out accurately. On other hand, NASA also claims this is because of the inferior quality of pictures.
Did astronauts by NASA really land on the moon’s surface? If YES, then why nobody attempts to go again on the moon after Neil Armstrong. Still a challenging question for everybody in this conspiracy theory.
Believe it or not?
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
Just wish to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity in your submit is just great and i could think you're knowledgeable
in this subject. Fine with your permission let me to clutch your RSS feed to
stay up to date with approaching post. Thanks one million and please keep up the rewarding
work.
Film from the Apollo 11 landing craft shows a shadow cast on the lunar surface from the legs of the craft while several hundred feet above the lunar surface. This cannot happen when the sun is so low in the sky as it was in July 1969. The camera stopped filming before touchdown .
Footage of Fake Moon Landing - Here
You can tell from the totally real looking mountain in the background of that one photo that we totally went to the moon. Never mind that even after 50 years of technological progress such a feat cannot be duplicated, it had to be real cause my grandma saw it on television! And besides, they wouldn't lie about something like that. I mean, the government lies to the public all the time, just not about that. Plus, they have all the documentation to prove it. I mean, they did, until they lost and/or destroyed all of the original film footage, mission data, and blueprints they had. Just because it was the greatest achievement in human history doesn't mean that you gotta keep that sort of stuff. So what if the national archives has managed to keep the original declaration of independence and the constitution? Everybody knows that it is easier to hang onto 200 year old documents than it is to keep 50 year old documents in storage! Facts y'all.